Military Article 120 UCMJ civilian defense counsel

A service member facing an Article 120 allegation is entitled to detailed military defense counsel provided by the service, and may in addition retain civilian counsel. The two work together rather than in place of one another. What retained civilian counsel adds is continuity, capacity and the ability to address the administrative consequences that run alongside the court-martial and frequently outlast it. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. has practiced since 1997 and Mr. Sris is admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey and New York. Reach our location at (888) 437-7747.

Table of Contents

How the Military Process Differs

An allegation is investigated by a service investigative organization rather than by civilian police. The command is informed and takes its own action independently — a no-contact order, a change in duties, suspension of a security clearance, flagging that halts favorable personnel actions including promotion, transfer and separation. Those steps arrive early and require no finding.

The case then moves through a preliminary hearing under Article 32 before any referral to court-martial. That hearing is not a trial and its purpose is limited, but it is the first occasion on which the government’s evidence is examined, and what happens there shapes the referral decision.

What Civilian Counsel Adds

Detailed military defense counsel are experienced in this system and carry the case. Civilian counsel engaged alongside them adds capacity for the parallel matters — the clearance action, the administrative separation exposure, the professional licensing question where the member holds a credential, and the civilian consequences of any conviction, including registration.

Continuity matters too. Military counsel rotate on assignment cycles; retained counsel do not. Where a matter runs long, that continuity is practical rather than theoretical.

This page describes what retained counsel adds. It makes no comparison with detailed military defense counsel, who represent service members in these matters as a matter of right.

The Administrative Track

An acquittal at court-martial does not end the matter. Administrative separation proceedings can follow on the same facts, applying a lower standard, and can result in separation with a characterization of service that affects benefits, employment and eligibility for years afterwards.

For officers, a board of inquiry performs the equivalent function. For enlisted members, an administrative separation board does. Either can act where a criminal proceeding did not, which is the single most important thing for a service member to understand about the shape of the exposure.

Registration and the Civilian Side

A conviction at court-martial for a qualifying offence carries civilian registration obligations in the state of residence after service, and those obligations operate under state law rather than military law. Members frequently learn of this at separation rather than at trial, and it is part of the exposure from the outset rather than an afterthought.

Collateral Consequences: Employment, Professional License, Security Clearance, Immigration

The proceedings that run alongside a criminal charge apply their own standards and reach their own conclusions. A professional licensing board can act on conduct that produced no conviction, applying a civil standard of proof rather than the criminal one. A security clearance adjudication examines conduct, candour and judgment, and a clearance can be suspended on an allegation alone. An employer may act under its own policies on its own timetable. For a person who is not a United States citizen, an offence in this category can carry immigration consequences that are severe and in some categories effectively automatic; immigration advice should be obtained alongside the criminal defense rather than after it. The firm does not advise on immigration matters and refers that question.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I need civilian counsel if I have detailed military counsel?

Detailed military defense counsel represent service members as a matter of right and carry the case. Retained civilian counsel is engaged in addition, typically to add capacity for the parallel clearance, separation, licensing and civilian-consequence matters, and to provide continuity across assignment cycles. This page makes no comparison between them.

What is an Article 32 hearing?

A preliminary hearing conducted before any referral to court-martial. It is not a trial and its purpose is limited, but it is the first occasion on which the government’s evidence is examined and it informs the referral decision. What is developed there frequently shapes everything that follows.

What does my command do in the meantime?

It acts independently of the criminal process — a no-contact order, a change of duties, suspension of clearance, and flagging that halts favorable personnel actions including promotion, transfer and separation. Those steps arrive early and require no finding of any kind.

If I am acquitted, is it over?

Not necessarily. Administrative separation proceedings can follow on the same facts under a lower standard, and can result in separation with a characterization of service affecting benefits, employment and eligibility for years. For officers a board of inquiry performs that function; for enlisted members an administrative separation board does.

Does a court-martial conviction mean registration?

A conviction for a qualifying offence carries civilian registration obligations in the state of residence after service, under state law rather than military law. Service members frequently discover this at separation rather than at trial, which is why it belongs in the analysis from the beginning.

My clearance was suspended before anything happened. Is that normal?

Yes. Clearance suspension is an interim administrative step requiring no charge or finding, and it commonly follows within days of the command learning of an allegation. It is adjudicated separately, on its own standard, and it does not wait for the court-martial to conclude.

About Mr. Sris

Mr. Sris is the owner and founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., which has practiced since 1997. He is a former prosecutor and is admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey and New York. Of Counsel attorneys contract directly with the firm and handle matters alongside him.

Speak With Mr. Sris

An acquittal at court-martial does not end the administrative exposure, which runs on a lower standard and its own timetable. Request a consultation. Reach our location at (888) 437-7747. Consultations are by appointment.

Last reviewed: August 24, 2026.

Attorney Advertising. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., principal office: 4008 Williamsburg Court, Fairfax, VA 22032. By appointment. Call (888) 437-7747 to schedule.

The information on this page is general and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by reading it or by contacting the firm. Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case. Results may vary.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Attorney responsible for this advertising: Mr. Sris.