Close in age Romeo and Juliet defense attorney

Age-proximity provisions — commonly called Romeo and Juliet provisions — reduce or remove liability where the two people involved were close in age. They are narrower than their popular reputation suggests. Some reduce a felony to a lesser grade rather than eliminating the offence; some apply only within a specific age band; some apply only where neither party was above a stated age. Whether one applies is answered by reading the statute, not by the general proposition that the parties were teenagers. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. has practiced since 1997 and Mr. Sris is admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey and New York. Reach our location at (888) 437-7747.

Table of Contents

What These Provisions Actually Do

They take several forms and the differences matter. Some provide a complete defense where the age gap falls within a stated range. Some reduce the grade of the offence rather than removing it — Virginia’s carnal knowledge provision at Va. Code § 18.2-63 works this way, treating the offence as a Class 4 felony generally, a Class 6 felony where the offender is a minor at least three years older than the child, and a Class 4 misdemeanor where the offender is also a minor and within three years of age. Some apply only where the younger party was above a floor age. Some are unavailable entirely where a position of authority or trust existed.

Because the structures differ this much, the analysis is always the specific statute in the version in force at the relevant time.

Age Is an Element and It Is Proved

Where a provision turns on ages and on the interval between them, those become elements to be established rather than background. Dates of birth are proved by record. The date of the conduct matters, sometimes to the day, because an interval that falls within a provision on one date may fall outside it weeks later.

Where conduct is alleged over a period rather than on a single occasion, the analysis can differ across that period, and a charge framed generally may not survive precise dating.

Where the Provision Does Not Reach

These provisions do not generally apply where a position of authority, trust or supervision existed — a coach, a teacher, a family member, an employer. They do not apply where force or incapacity is alleged, because those provisions address consent-based conduct rather than conduct the statute treats as forcible. They do not usually apply to offences involving images, which are governed by separate statutes with their own structures and which frequently make no allowance for age proximity at all.

That last point catches people out regularly: conduct that falls within an age-proximity provision may nonetheless produce serious exposure under image-related statutes on the same facts.

Consequences Where the Provision Applies

Where a provision reduces rather than eliminates the offence, the reduced grade still carries consequences, and whether registration attaches to the reduced grade is a separate question answered from the registration statute rather than from the offence statute. Establishing that before a plea is entered is essential, because a resolution that looks favorable on the grade can carry a registration consequence that outlasts everything else.

Collateral Consequences: Employment, Professional License, Security Clearance, Immigration

The proceedings that run alongside a criminal charge apply their own standards and reach their own conclusions. A professional licensing board can act on conduct that produced no conviction, applying a civil standard of proof rather than the criminal one. A security clearance adjudication examines conduct, candour and judgment, and a clearance can be suspended on an allegation alone. An employer may act under its own policies on its own timetable. For a person who is not a United States citizen, an offence in this category can carry immigration consequences that are severe and in some categories effectively automatic; immigration advice should be obtained alongside the criminal defense rather than after it. The firm does not advise on immigration matters and refers that question.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does a close-in-age provision mean no offence at all?

Sometimes, but often it reduces the grade rather than removing the offence. Virginia’s carnal knowledge provision at Va. Code § 18.2-63 illustrates the pattern: a Class 4 felony generally, a Class 6 felony where the offender is a minor at least three years older, and a Class 4 misdemeanor where the offender is a minor within three years of age.

How exact do the ages have to be?

Exact. Where a provision turns on ages and the interval between them, those are elements proved by record, and the date of the conduct can matter to the day. An interval falling within a provision on one date may fall outside it weeks later, which is why precise dating frequently decides these cases.

Does it apply if I was their coach or teacher?

Generally not. These provisions ordinarily do not reach conduct where a position of authority, trust or supervision existed, and separate statutes frequently address that relationship directly and treat it as an aggravating element rather than a mitigating one.

What if images are involved?

Image-related statutes are separate and frequently make no allowance for age proximity at all. Conduct that falls within an age-proximity provision can still produce serious exposure under those statutes on the same facts. That is one of the most common and most damaging surprises in this area.

Does registration still apply if the grade is reduced?

It is a separate question answered from the registration statute rather than from the offence statute, and the answer is not always what the reduced grade suggests. It has to be established before any plea, because a resolution that looks favorable on grade can carry a registration consequence that outlasts the disposition.

Where do I start?

With the specific provision charged, in the version in force on the date of the conduct, and with the documentary proof of both ages. The general proposition that the parties were close in age answers nothing; the statutory structure and the exact dates answer everything.

About Mr. Sris

Mr. Sris is the owner and founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., which has practiced since 1997. He is a former prosecutor and is admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey and New York. Of Counsel attorneys contract directly with the firm and handle matters alongside him.

Speak With Mr. Sris

These provisions are narrower than their reputation, and image-related statutes frequently make no allowance for age proximity at all. Request a consultation. Reach our location at (888) 437-7747. Consultations are by appointment.

Last reviewed: August 24, 2026.

Attorney Advertising. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., principal office: 4008 Williamsburg Court, Fairfax, VA 22032. By appointment. Call (888) 437-7747 to schedule.

The information on this page is general and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by reading it or by contacting the firm. Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case. Results may vary.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Attorney responsible for this advertising: Mr. Sris.