Continuing course of sexual abuse Maryland attorney

A continuing course charge alleges repeated conduct over a period rather than a single incident, and that structure changes the defense fundamentally. There is no single date to test against a record, no single event to reconstruct, and the generality that makes the charge easier for the State to allege creates specific difficulties for it as well. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. has practiced since 1997 and Mr. Sris is a former prosecutor admitted in Maryland. Reach our location at (888) 437-7747.

Table of Contents

What the State Must Prove

The State must establish the qualifying conduct, that it occurred on the number of occasions the statute requires, that it occurred within the period alleged, and the age and relationship elements the provision specifies. The requirement of a minimum number of occasions is a genuine element and it is proved rather than assumed.

Because no single date is alleged, the period itself becomes an element with evidentiary consequences. Where the accused was not present, not resident, or not in the relationship alleged for part of the period, that bears directly on whether the required occasions can have occurred within it.

Penalties and Sentencing Exposure

Exposure under this provision is substantial and reflects the repeated nature of the conduct alleged. This page states no figures that have not been verified against the current text, so exposure should be confirmed against the section actually charged. Registration obligations attach and operate independently of any sentence.

This page does not state maximum terms or mandatory minimums that have not been verified against the current text of the provision, because an inaccurate figure in this context is worse than none. The exposure applicable to a particular matter should be confirmed against the section actually charged.

Sex Offender Registration Consequences

Registration is not part of the sentence and it is not discretionary where the statute requires it. It attaches on conviction for defined offences, imposes reporting obligations that continue for a defined period or for life depending on the offence, and carries separate criminal exposure for failure to comply. Registration also drives residency and employment restrictions, appears on public databases, and follows a person across state lines through separate obligations in any new state of residence. Because the registration consequence frequently outlasts the sentence, it belongs in the analysis from the first conversation rather than at sentencing.

How These Cases Are Investigated

Investigations in this area typically begin before anyone is arrested and often before the person under investigation knows one exists. A report is made to police or through a mandated reporter; a forensic interview may be conducted; devices may be seized under warrant and examined by a digital forensics unit; and investigators may attempt a recorded telephone call or an interview framed as a chance to give an account. Each step generates a record. These matters typically rest on a recorded forensic interview and on an account developed over time rather than on contemporaneous physical evidence, and the sequence of disclosures preceding the interview frequently matters more than the interview itself. The most consequential decisions in a case of this kind are frequently made during that period rather than in court, which is why advice at the investigative stage matters more than at any later stage.

Defenses That Apply to This Charge

The period is the most productive ground. Where residence, employment, travel, custody arrangements, school records or deployment establish that the accused was absent for substantial portions of the alleged period, the arithmetic of the required occasions becomes a real problem for the State. That is documentary work rather than argument.

The occasions element is examined directly. Whether the evidence establishes the number of distinct occasions the statute requires, as opposed to a general assertion of repeated conduct, is a genuine question and one that generality tends to obscure.

How the account was obtained is examined as in any case of this kind: the recorded forensic interview against the protocol, what preceded it, how many times the child had been asked and by whom, and whether the account has changed over successive tellings. Where the period alleged is broad, notice and specificity questions can also arise about whether the defense can meaningfully answer the charge.

What Happens at the First Court Appearance

The first appearance addresses custody and conditions rather than guilt. The court is told what the charge is, counsel is identified or appointed, and release is taken up along with the conditions attaching to it. Conditions in these cases commonly include no contact with the complaining witness and with people connected to them, restrictions on internet or device use, and in some circumstances restrictions on where a person may live or work. Those conditions take effect immediately and violating them creates a separate and independent problem. Nothing at the first appearance requires a plea to the substance, and it is not the stage at which the evidence is examined.

What Retained Counsel Does at This Stage

Counsel can be engaged before a charge exists, which is the point at which the fewest options have closed. Engagement at that stage allows counsel to communicate with investigators on the client’s behalf, to preserve material that would otherwise be lost, to arrange independent examination of digital evidence, and to ensure that any decision about whether to speak to investigators is made with advice rather than under pressure. It also allows the parallel proceedings — licensing, clearance, employment, campus — to be sequenced deliberately rather than reacted to. This page describes what engagement at that stage makes possible. It does not compare the firm to any other counsel, and everyone facing an allegation of this kind is entitled to representation.

Collateral Consequences: Employment, Professional License, Security Clearance, Immigration

The proceedings that run alongside a criminal charge apply their own standards and reach their own conclusions. A professional licensing board can act on conduct that produced no conviction, applying a civil standard of proof rather than the criminal one. A security clearance adjudication examines conduct, candour and judgment, and a clearance can be suspended on an allegation alone. An employer may act under its own policies on its own timetable. For a person who is not a United States citizen, an offence in this category can carry immigration consequences that are severe and in some categories effectively automatic; immigration advice should be obtained alongside the criminal defense rather than after it. The firm does not advise on immigration matters and refers that question.

Frequently Asked Questions

What makes this different from a single-incident charge?

It alleges repeated conduct over a period rather than one event, so there is no single date to test against a record and no single incident to reconstruct. That generality makes the charge easier to allege and creates specific evidentiary difficulties for the State in return.

Is the number of occasions really an element?

Yes. The statute requires conduct on a minimum number of occasions, and that is proved rather than assumed. Whether the evidence establishes distinct occasions of that number, as opposed to a general assertion of repeated conduct, is a genuine question.

How does the alleged period help the defense?

It becomes an element with evidentiary consequences. Residence, employment, travel, custody arrangements, school records and deployment can establish absence for substantial portions of the period, and that makes the arithmetic of the required occasions a real problem. It is documentary work rather than argument.

What if the account has changed over time?

That is examined directly. Successive tellings — to a family member, in an initial report, in a recorded forensic interview, in any later proceeding — are obtained and compared for what changed and when. Documented change carries weight that argument about credibility does not.

Can the forensic interview be examined?

Its methodology can be compared against the protocol the interviewer was trained in, and what preceded it frequently matters more — how many times the child had been asked and by whom, and what was said at any initial disclosure. That is an examination of professional method rather than of the child.

Can a charge be too vague to answer?

Where the period alleged is very broad, notice and specificity questions can arise about whether the defense can meaningfully respond. Whether that argument is available depends on how the charge is framed and on the authority in the jurisdiction, and it is raised before trial where it applies.

About Mr. Sris

Mr. Sris is the owner and founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., which has practiced since 1997. He is a former prosecutor and is admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey and New York. Of Counsel attorneys contract directly with the firm and handle matters alongside him.

Speak With Mr. Sris

The alleged period is an element, and records establishing absence across it turn the required number of occasions into an arithmetic problem for the State. Request a consultation. Reach our location at (888) 437-7747. Consultations are by appointment.

Last reviewed: August 24, 2026.

Attorney Advertising. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., principal office: 4008 Williamsburg Court, Fairfax, VA 22032. By appointment. Call (888) 437-7747 to schedule.

The information on this page is general and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by reading it or by contacting the firm. Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case. Results may vary.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Attorney responsible for this advertising: Mr. Sris.